Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Vanuatu: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Saint Kitts and Nevis
64.71
in 2019
Vanuatu
64.71
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
99th
Vanuatu rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th and Vanuatu ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.71 | 58.82 | 5.88 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 64.71 | 61.18 | 3.53 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Vanuatu?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Vanuatu?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Vanuatu?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Vanuatu rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th and Vanuatu ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.