Saint Lucia vs Thailand: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Saint Lucia
76.47
in 2019
Thailand
76.47
in 2019
Saint Lucia rank
52nd
Thailand rank
52nd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Saint Lucia
- Thailand
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 76.47 against 76.47 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.76 | 48.24 | 23.53 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 76.47 | 67.06 | 9.41 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Saint Lucia or Thailand?
- Saint Lucia, at 76.47 against 76.47 in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Saint Lucia and Thailand?
- 0, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Thailand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Lucia and Thailand rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Saint Lucia ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.