Switzerland vs United States of America: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Switzerland
70.59
in 2019
United States of America
70.59
in 2019
Switzerland rank
77th
United States of America rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Switzerland
- United States of America
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in United States of America, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Switzerland ranks 77th and United States of America ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Switzerland | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.59 | 70.59 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 70.59 | 70.59 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Switzerland or United States of America?
- Switzerland, at 70.59 against 70.59 in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Switzerland and United States of America?
- 0, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and United States of America?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Switzerland and United States of America rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Switzerland ranks 77th and United States of America ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.