Trinidad and Tobago vs Zambia: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Trinidad and Tobago
64.71
in 2019
Zambia
64.71
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago rank
99th
Zambia rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Zambia
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 99th and Zambia ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 64.71 | 11.76 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 62.94 | 64.12 | 1.18 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Trinidad and Tobago or Zambia?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
- 0, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 99th and Zambia ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.