Argentina vs Indonesia: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Argentina
35.29
in 2019
Indonesia
39.88
in 2019
Argentina rank
180th
Indonesia rank
179th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Argentina
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 39.88 against 35.29 in Argentina, a difference of 4.59.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 180th and Indonesia ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.73 | 26.05 | 1.68 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 26.47 | 35.95 | 9.48 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Argentina or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 39.88 against 35.29 in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Argentina and Indonesia?
- 4.59, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Indonesia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Indonesia rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Argentina ranks 180th and Indonesia ranks 179th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.