Bahrain vs Trinidad and Tobago: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Bahrain
64.71
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
64.71
in 2019
Bahrain rank
97th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
97th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Bahrain
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 97th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 97th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.82 | 52.94 | 5.88 | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 61.18 | 62.94 | 1.76 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Bahrain or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Bahrain, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Bahrain and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Bahrain and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Bahrain ranks 97th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 97th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.