Barbados vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Barbados
64.71
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of
64.71
in 2019
Barbados rank
97th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
97th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Barbados
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 97th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 97th of 191 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Barbados or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Barbados, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Barbados and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Barbados ranks 97th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 97th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.