Brazil vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 43.47 against 41.18 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 2.29.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Iran, Islamic Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Brazil ranks 171st and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.65 | 40.34 | 22.69 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 39.97 | 42.35 | 2.38 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Brazil or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Brazil, at 43.47 against 41.18 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 2.29, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Brazil ranks 171st and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.