Brazil vs Palestine: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Brazil
43.47
in 2019
Palestine
41.18
in 2019
Brazil rank
171st
Palestine rank
172nd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Palestine
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 43.47 against 41.18 in Palestine, a difference of 2.29.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Palestine ahead.
Brazil ranks 171st and Palestine ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.63 | 25.49 | 6.86 | Palestine |
| 2010s | 39.97 | 37.65 | 2.32 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Brazil or Palestine?
- Brazil, at 43.47 against 41.18 in Palestine as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Brazil and Palestine?
- 2.29, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Palestine?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Palestine rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Brazil ranks 171st and Palestine ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.