Brunei Darussalam vs Kazakhstan: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
82.35
in 2019
Kazakhstan
82.35
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
27th
Kazakhstan rank
27th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 27th and Kazakhstan ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 54.41 | 54.41 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 35.29 | 70.59 | 35.29 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Kazakhstan?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Kazakhstan?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Kazakhstan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Kazakhstan rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 27th and Kazakhstan ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.