Burkina Faso vs Chinese Taipei: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Burkina Faso
88.24
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
88.24
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
7th
Chinese Taipei rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 7th and Chinese Taipei ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Chinese Taipei in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.3 | 60.5 | 4.2 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 87.65 | 86.47 | 1.18 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Burkina Faso or Chinese Taipei?
- Burkina Faso, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Burkina Faso and Chinese Taipei?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chinese Taipei?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Chinese Taipei rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 7th and Chinese Taipei ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.