Democratic Republic of Congo vs Norway: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
82.35
in 2019
Norway
82.35
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
27th
Norway rank
27th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Norway
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Norway, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 27th and Norway ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.65 | 77.31 | 59.66 | Norway |
| 2010s | 59.41 | 80 | 20.59 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Norway?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 27th and Norway ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.