Congo vs Palestine, State of: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Congo
41.18
in 2019
Palestine, State of
41.18
in 2019
Congo rank
172nd
Palestine, State of rank
172nd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Congo
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Congo currently reports 41.18 against 41.18 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 172nd and Palestine, State of ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.29 | 25.49 | 9.8 | Congo |
| 2010s | 37.06 | 37.65 | 0.5883 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Congo or Palestine, State of?
- Congo, at 41.18 against 41.18 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Congo and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Palestine, State of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Palestine, State of rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Congo ranks 172nd and Palestine, State of ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.