Egypt vs Sao Tome and Principe: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Egypt
70.59
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
70.59
in 2019
Egypt rank
73rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
73rd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Egypt
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Egypt ranks 73rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.25 | 41.18 | 3.92 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 51.18 | 65.29 | 14.12 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Egypt or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Egypt, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Egypt ranks 73rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.