El Salvador vs Guinea-Bissau: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
El Salvador
52.94
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
52.94
in 2019
El Salvador rank
145th
Guinea-Bissau rank
145th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 52.94 against 52.94 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 145th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th of 191 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.71 | 5.88 | 38.82 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 52.94 | 48.24 | 4.71 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, El Salvador or Guinea-Bissau?
- El Salvador, at 52.94 against 52.94 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 145th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.