Guinea-Bissau vs Qatar: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
52.94
in 2019
Qatar
52.94
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
145th
Qatar rank
145th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Qatar
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 52.94 against 52.94 in Qatar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Qatar ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Qatar ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.88 | 52.94 | 47.06 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 48.24 | 47.65 | 0.5883 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Qatar?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 52.94 against 52.94 in Qatar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Qatar?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Qatar?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Qatar rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Qatar ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.