Jordan vs Syrian Arab Republic: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Jordan
58.82
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
58.82
in 2019
Jordan rank
129th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
129th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 58.82 against 58.82 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Jordan ranks 129th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 129th of 191 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.54 | 36.13 | 8.4 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 58.82 | 58.82 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Jordan or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Jordan, at 58.82 against 58.82 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Jordan and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Jordan ranks 129th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 129th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.