South Korea vs Tajikistan: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
South Korea
88.24
in 2019
Tajikistan
88.24
in 2019
South Korea rank
7th
Tajikistan rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- South Korea
- Tajikistan
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 7th and Tajikistan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.41 | 28.24 | 21.18 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 81.18 | 78.24 | 2.94 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, South Korea or Tajikistan?
- South Korea, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between South Korea and Tajikistan?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Tajikistan rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- South Korea ranks 7th and Tajikistan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.