South Korea vs Uzbekistan: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
South Korea
88.24
in 2019
Uzbekistan
88.24
in 2019
South Korea rank
7th
Uzbekistan rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- South Korea
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
South Korea ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.74 | 49.58 | 0.8404 | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 81.18 | 74.12 | 7.06 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, South Korea or Uzbekistan?
- South Korea, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between South Korea and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Uzbekistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Uzbekistan rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- South Korea ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.