Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Chinese Taipei: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
88.24
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
88.24
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
7th
Chinese Taipei rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 7th and Chinese Taipei ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 70.59 | 17.65 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 74.71 | 86.47 | 11.76 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Chinese Taipei?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 88.24 against 88.24 in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Chinese Taipei?
- 0, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Chinese Taipei?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Chinese Taipei rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 7th and Chinese Taipei ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.