Kosovo vs Republic of Moldova: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Kosovo
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
88.24
in 2019
Kosovo rank
7th
Republic of Moldova rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Kosovo
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Kosovo ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 52.94 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 74.71 | 71.76 | 2.94 | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Kosovo or Republic of Moldova?
- Kosovo, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Kosovo and Republic of Moldova?
- 0, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Republic of Moldova?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo and Republic of Moldova rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Kosovo ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.