Kuwait vs United States of America: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Kuwait
70.59
in 2019
United States of America
70.59
in 2019
Kuwait rank
73rd
United States of America rank
73rd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Kuwait
- United States of America
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in United States of America, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 73rd and United States of America ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.53 | 70.59 | 47.06 | United States of America |
| 2010s | 37.65 | 70.59 | 32.94 | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Kuwait or United States of America?
- Kuwait, at 70.59 against 70.59 in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Kuwait and United States of America?
- 0, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and United States of America?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kuwait and United States of America rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Kuwait ranks 73rd and United States of America ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.