Malawi vs Micronesia (country): Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Malawi
64.71
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
64.71
in 2019
Malawi rank
97th
Micronesia (country) rank
97th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Malawi
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 97th and Micronesia (country) ranks 97th of 191 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.06 | 64.71 | 17.65 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 56.47 | 64.71 | 8.24 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Malawi or Micronesia (country)?
- Malawi, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Malawi and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Micronesia (country)?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Micronesia (country) rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Malawi ranks 97th and Micronesia (country) ranks 97th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.