Mauritius vs Russian Federation: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Mauritius
82.35
in 2019
Russian Federation
82.35
in 2019
Mauritius rank
27th
Russian Federation rank
27th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 27th and Russian Federation ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 57.84 | 8.82 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 72.94 | 73.06 | 0.1177 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Mauritius or Russian Federation?
- Mauritius, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Mauritius and Russian Federation?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Russian Federation?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Russian Federation rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 27th and Russian Federation ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.