Republic of Moldova vs Tajikistan: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Republic of Moldova
88.24
in 2019
Tajikistan
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
7th
Tajikistan rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 7th and Tajikistan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.88 | 28.24 | 17.65 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 71.76 | 78.24 | 6.47 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Republic of Moldova or Tajikistan?
- Republic of Moldova, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Republic of Moldova and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Tajikistan rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 7th and Tajikistan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.