Morocco vs Russian Federation: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Morocco
82.35
in 2019
Russian Federation
82.35
in 2019
Morocco rank
27th
Russian Federation rank
27th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Morocco
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 27th and Russian Federation ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.5 | 53.78 | 6.72 | Morocco |
| 2010s | 73.53 | 73.06 | 0.4706 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Morocco or Russian Federation?
- Morocco, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Morocco and Russian Federation?
- 0, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Russian Federation?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Morocco and Russian Federation rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Morocco ranks 27th and Russian Federation ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.