North Macedonia vs United States: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
North Macedonia
70.59
in 2019
United States
70.59
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
73rd
United States rank
73rd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- United States
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in United States, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United States ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 73rd and United States ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and United States in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.77 | 70.59 | 37.82 | United States |
| 2010s | 71.18 | 70.59 | 0.5882 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, North Macedonia or United States?
- North Macedonia, at 70.59 against 70.59 in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between North Macedonia and United States?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and United States?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and United States rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 73rd and United States ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.