Russian Federation vs Saudi Arabia: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Russian Federation
82.35
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
82.35
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
27th
Saudi Arabia rank
27th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Russian Federation
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 27th and Saudi Arabia ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.78 | 9.24 | 44.54 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 73.06 | 27.65 | 45.41 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Russian Federation or Saudi Arabia?
- Russian Federation, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Russian Federation ranks 27th and Saudi Arabia ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.