Syrian Arab Republic vs Viet Nam: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Syrian Arab Republic
58.82
in 2019
Viet Nam
58.82
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic rank
129th
Viet Nam rank
129th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 58.82 against 58.82 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 129th and Viet Nam ranks 129th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.13 | 46.22 | 10.08 | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 58.82 | 54.12 | 4.71 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Syrian Arab Republic or Viet Nam?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 58.82 against 58.82 in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam?
- 0, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 129th and Viet Nam ranks 129th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.