Taiwan, China vs Tajikistan: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Taiwan, China
88.24
in 2019
Tajikistan
88.24
in 2019
Taiwan, China rank
7th
Tajikistan rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Taiwan, China
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Taiwan, China currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan, China ahead.
Taiwan, China ranks 7th and Tajikistan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Taiwan, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Taiwan, China | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.18 | 28.24 | 32.94 | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 86.47 | 78.24 | 8.24 | Taiwan, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Taiwan, China or Tajikistan?
- Taiwan, China, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Taiwan, China and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Taiwan, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan, China and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Taiwan, China and Tajikistan rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Taiwan, China ranks 7th and Tajikistan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.