Chinese Taipei vs United Arab Emirates: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Chinese Taipei
88.24
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
88.24
in 2019
Chinese Taipei rank
7th
United Arab Emirates rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Chinese Taipei
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Chinese Taipei ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chinese Taipei | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.5 | 44.54 | 15.97 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 86.47 | 70 | 16.47 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Chinese Taipei or United Arab Emirates?
- Chinese Taipei, at 88.24 against 88.24 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Chinese Taipei and United Arab Emirates rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Chinese Taipei ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.