Tajikistan vs United Arab Emirates: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Tajikistan
88.24
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
88.24
in 2019
Tajikistan rank
7th
United Arab Emirates rank
7th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Tajikistan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.24 | 45.88 | 17.65 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 78.24 | 70 | 8.24 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Tajikistan or United Arab Emirates?
- Tajikistan, at 88.24 against 88.24 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Tajikistan and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Tajikistan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Tajikistan ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.