Angola vs Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Angola
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
How they compare
Angola currently reports 64.32 against 60.8 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 3.52.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia, Plurinational State of's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Angola ranks 166th and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 169th of 190 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.39 | 48.38 | 26.99 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
| 2010s | 49.25 | 54.37 | 5.13 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Angola or Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Angola, at 64.32 against 60.8 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Angola and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 3.52, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Angola ranks 166th and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 169th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.