Antigua and Barbuda vs Croatia: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
81.41
in 2019
Croatia
80.9
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
138th
Croatia rank
140th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Croatia
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 81.41 against 80.9 in Croatia, a difference of 0.51.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 138th and Croatia ranks 140th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.59 | 76.08 | 1.51 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 78.69 | 78.64 | 0.0503 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Croatia?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 81.41 against 80.9 in Croatia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Croatia?
- 0.51, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Croatia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Croatia rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 138th and Croatia ranks 140th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.