Austria vs Central African Republic: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Austria
79.4
in 2019
Central African Republic
78.39
in 2019
Austria rank
143rd
Central African Republic rank
146th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Austria
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Austria currently reports 79.4 against 78.39 in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Austria ranks 143rd and Central African Republic ranks 146th of 190 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.38 | 77.96 | 2.58 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 77.59 | 78.19 | 0.603 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Austria or Central African Republic?
- Austria, at 79.4 against 78.39 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Austria and Central African Republic?
- 1.01, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Central African Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Central African Republic rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Austria ranks 143rd and Central African Republic ranks 146th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.