Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
20.1
in 2019
Cambodia
1.01
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
186th
Cambodia rank
189th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Cambodia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 20.1 against 1.01 in Cambodia, a difference of 19.09.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 20.0 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 186th and Cambodia ranks 189th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.21 | 7.32 | 5.89 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 16.78 | 1.71 | 15.08 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cambodia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 20.1 against 1.01 in Cambodia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
- 19.09, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 186th and Cambodia ranks 189th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.