Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
20.1
in 2019
Suriname
34.17
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
186th
Suriname rank
183rd
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 34.17 against 20.1 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 14.07.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.7 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 186th and Suriname ranks 183rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.62 | 0 | 4.62 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 16.78 | 16.88 | 0.1005 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 34.17 against 20.1 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
- 14.07, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 186th and Suriname ranks 183rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.