Cambodia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Cambodia
1.01
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
0
in 2019
Cambodia rank
188th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
189th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Cambodia
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 1.01 against 0 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 1.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 188th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 189th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.32 | 6.03 | 1.29 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 1.71 | 7.24 | 5.53 | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Cambodia or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Cambodia, at 1.01 against 0 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Cambodia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 1.01, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 188th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 189th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.