Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Central African Republic
78.39
in 2019
Eswatini
78.89
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
147th
Eswatini rank
145th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 78.89 against 78.39 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 147th and Eswatini ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.79 | 40.2 | 37.59 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 78.19 | 62.56 | 15.63 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Central African Republic or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 78.89 against 78.39 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 0.5, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 147th and Eswatini ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.