Central African Republic vs Nepal: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Central African Republic
78.39
in 2019
Nepal
77.89
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
147th
Nepal rank
148th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Nepal
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 78.39 against 77.89 in Nepal, a difference of 0.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 147th and Nepal ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.96 | 69.35 | 8.61 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 78.19 | 78.74 | 0.5528 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Central African Republic or Nepal?
- Central African Republic, at 78.39 against 77.89 in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Central African Republic and Nepal?
- 0.5, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Nepal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Nepal rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 147th and Nepal ranks 148th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.