China (People’s Republic of) vs Tunisia: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
China (People’s Republic of)
91.91
in 2019
Tunisia
91.46
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
68th
Tunisia rank
69th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Tunisia
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 91.91 against 91.46 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tunisia ahead.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 68th and Tunisia ranks 69th of 190 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.44 | 87.44 | 29 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 72.67 | 88.24 | 15.57 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, China (People’s Republic of) or Tunisia?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 91.91 against 91.46 in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between China (People’s Republic of) and Tunisia?
- 0.45, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Tunisia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Tunisia rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 68th and Tunisia ranks 69th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.