Comoros vs Micronesia (country): Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score

Comoros
84.42
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
84.42
in 2019
Comoros rank
116th
Micronesia (country) rank
116th

Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Micronesia (country)
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 84.42 against 84.42 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 116th and Micronesia (country) ranks 116th of 188 countries.

Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 73.57 84.42 10.85 Micronesia (country)
2010s 82.81 84.42 1.61 Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Comoros or Micronesia (country)?
Comoros, at 84.42 against 84.42 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Comoros and Micronesia (country)?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Micronesia (country)?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Micronesia (country) rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
Comoros ranks 116th and Micronesia (country) ranks 116th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.