Democratic Republic of Congo vs Hungary: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
93.47
in 2019
Hungary
93.47
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
43rd
Hungary rank
43rd
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Hungary
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 93.47 against 93.47 in Hungary, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 43rd and Hungary ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 69.78 | 69.78 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 70.65 | 93.87 | 23.22 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Hungary?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 93.47 against 93.47 in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Hungary?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Hungary?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Hungary rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 43rd and Hungary ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.