Congo, Rep. vs Namibia: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score

Congo, Rep.
51.26
in 2019
Namibia
46.23
in 2019
Congo, Rep. rank
177th
Namibia rank
178th

Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time

  • Congo, Rep.
  • Namibia
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Congo, Rep. currently reports 51.26 against 46.23 in Namibia, a difference of 5.03.

That makes Congo, Rep.'s figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Congo, Rep. ahead.

Congo, Rep. ranks 177th and Namibia ranks 178th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Congo, Rep. averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Rep. Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 44.94 15.51 29.43 Congo, Rep.
2010s 30.65 37.79 7.14 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Congo, Rep. or Namibia?
Congo, Rep., at 51.26 against 46.23 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Congo, Rep. and Namibia?
5.03, with Congo, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Rep. and Namibia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Congo, Rep. and Namibia rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
Congo, Rep. ranks 177th and Namibia ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.