Cyprus vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Cyprus
94.47
in 2019
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
94.47
in 2019
Cyprus rank
35th
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
35th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Cyprus
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 94.47 against 94.47 in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 35th and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 35th of 190 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Mauritania, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.46 | 81.41 | 11.06 | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 93.27 | 88.64 | 4.62 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Cyprus or Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- Cyprus, at 94.47 against 94.47 in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Cyprus and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Cyprus and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Cyprus ranks 35th and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 35th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.