Denmark vs Netherlands: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score

Denmark
96.98
in 2019
Netherlands
96.98
in 2019
Denmark rank
10th
Netherlands rank
10th

Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Netherlands
020406080100200320112019

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 96.98 against 96.98 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 10th and Netherlands ranks 10th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 93.68 92.03 1.65 Denmark
2010s 95.73 95.88 0.1507 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Denmark or Netherlands?
Denmark, at 96.98 against 96.98 in Netherlands as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Denmark and Netherlands?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Netherlands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Denmark and Netherlands rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
Denmark ranks 10th and Netherlands ranks 10th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.