Ecuador vs Palestine, State of: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Ecuador
51.76
in 2019
Palestine, State of
57.29
in 2019
Ecuador rank
179th
Palestine, State of rank
176th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Ecuador
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 57.29 against 51.76 in Ecuador, a difference of 5.53.
That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Ecuador ranks 179th and Palestine, State of ranks 176th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.15 | 29.98 | 0.1676 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 47.99 | 52.36 | 4.37 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Ecuador or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 57.29 against 51.76 in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Ecuador and Palestine, State of?
- 5.53, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Palestine, State of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Palestine, State of rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Ecuador ranks 179th and Palestine, State of ranks 176th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.