Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Grenada: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Egypt, Arab Republic of
88.44
in 2019
Grenada
88.44
in 2019
Egypt, Arab Republic of rank
94th
Grenada rank
94th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Egypt, Arab Republic of
- Grenada
How they compare
Egypt, Arab Republic of currently reports 88.44 against 88.44 in Grenada, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 94th and Grenada ranks 94th of 190 countries.
Egypt, Arab Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt, Arab Republic of | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.41 | 81 | 1.41 | Egypt, Arab Republic of |
| 2010s | 87.34 | 86.03 | 1.31 | Egypt, Arab Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Egypt, Arab Republic of or Grenada?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of, at 88.44 against 88.44 in Grenada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Grenada?
- 0, with Egypt, Arab Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Grenada?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Grenada rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 94th and Grenada ranks 94th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.