Equatorial Guinea vs Philippines: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score

Equatorial Guinea
67.34
in 2019
Philippines
67.34
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
159th
Philippines rank
159th

Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Philippines
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 67.34 against 67.34 in Philippines, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 159th and Philippines ranks 159th of 188 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 0 65.73 65.73 Philippines
2010s 20.2 70.85 50.65 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Philippines?
Equatorial Guinea, at 67.34 against 67.34 in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Philippines?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Philippines?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Philippines rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 159th and Philippines ranks 159th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.