Kiribati vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Kiribati
69.35
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
70.85
in 2019
Kiribati rank
159th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
158th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 70.85 against 69.35 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 159th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 158th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.78 | 66.76 | 4.02 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 69.35 | 71.06 | 1.71 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Kiribati or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 70.85 against 69.35 in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Kiribati and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 1.5, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 159th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 158th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.